L2 Concerns Detail Editor
Concern #377 | Governance Structure Gaps
Title
Governance Structure Gaps
0
characters
Description
The Academic Senate and Advisory Board structure may be too dependent on founders and lack operational autonomy.
0
characters
Origin
0
characters
Desired Outcome
A balanced governance model with independent members ensuring credible oversight and accountability.
0
characters
What Could Go Wrong
Potential perception of bias or founder influence could undermine trust of external partners.
0
characters
Current Situation
Draft constitution is under review; membership list dominated by founding team.
0
characters
Strategy Narrative (JSON)
0
characters
Proposed Strategy
Expand membership to include independent academics and international advisors with voting rights.
0
characters
Action Strategy (JSON List)
+ Add Step
×
Cause
Founders defined governance composition before engaging external advisors.
0
characters
Event
Accreditation assessors question independence of GTU’s governance model.
0
characters
Consequence
Loss of credibility and potential rejection of accreditation application.
0
characters
Notes
D00035
0
characters