L2 Concerns Detail Editor
Concern #449 | Evidence Standard Confusion (Formal Advocacy vs Story Capture)
Title
Evidence Standard Confusion (Formal Advocacy vs Story Capture)
0
characters
Description
A claim is made that formal bodies (e.g., UN) may require media evidence, while current plans are personal testimony capture and Facebook posting, creating confusion about the intended evidentiary standard.
0
characters
Origin
0
characters
Desired Outcome
Clarity on purpose and documentation levels: awareness storytelling vs structured documentation vs formal dossier, each with appropriate standards and disclaimers.
0
characters
What Could Go Wrong
Overclaiming credibility; contributors take risks believing content is "for the UN"; outsiders dismiss the effort as unserious; misunderstanding of what the output can be used for.
0
characters
Current Situation
Aspirational framing appears while processes remain informal and early-stage.
0
characters
Strategy Narrative (JSON)
0
characters
Proposed Strategy
Define "levels of documentation" (Level 1 anonymous narrative; Level 2 timeline + artefacts; Level 3 formal dossier); avoid invoking external bodies unless standards are met; document intended use per output.
0
characters
Action Strategy (JSON List)
+ Add Step
×
Cause
Unclear end-use and audience.
0
characters
Event
Documentation is framed as formal-evidence-ready without matching rigor.
0
characters
Consequence
Credibility risk and participant misunderstanding; potential misdirection of effort.
0
characters
Notes
0
characters