BIQ01 - What is the official name of your organisation/project (and any registration number if you have one, plus main contact, email address and phone number)?
The organisation identifies itself publicly as Harrisonite Lifecare Foundation. Its legal name, registration number and authorised Review contact are not stated clearly on the website and require direct confirmation.
BIQ02 - Are you registered (NGO / CBO / company / informal group)? If not, do you want to register?
The Foundation describes itself as a non-profit. The website does not establish whether it is separately incorporated or operates through another Harrisonite entity; its legal, governance and financial relationship with the wider insurance operation must be verified.
BIQ03 - What location(s) do you operate in (town/county/region)? Any plans to expand?
The stated mission focuses on elderly and vulnerable populations in Ojodu Berger, Lagos, while the website also refers more broadly to underserved communities. Exact delivery locations and expansion plans remain to be confirmed.
BIQ04 - What problem are you solving in one sentence?
The Foundation seeks to improve the dignity, health and resilience of elderly and vulnerable people by reducing barriers to healthcare, useful skills and essential community support.
BIQ05 - What does "success" look like for you in 6 months and 12 months?
In six months, success should include a verified baseline, active partner commitments, safe operating procedures and repeatable delivery. At twelve months it should include measured beneficiary outcomes, reliable funding and sustainable programmes; quantified targets must be agreed.
BIQ06 - What is your biggest constraint right now (money / people / equipment / skills / trust / transport / time / other)?
The largest constraint is not stated. Funding, delivery capacity, partner engagement and systematic outcome evidence are all plausible constraints that should be tested before one is prioritised.
BIQ07 - What are the top 3 priorities you want help with immediately?
The immediate priorities appear to be validating the operating and governance baseline, defining a reliable minimum service package, and establishing safeguarding, evidence and partner-accountability arrangements.
BIQ08 - What partners do you already work with (government, clinics, schools, NGOs, churches, local leaders)?
The website reports partnerships with multiple HMOs and refers to hospitals and medical professionals, but does not name them or publish agreements, responsibilities or results. Current engagement therefore requires evidence.
BIQ09 - What systems do you currently use (paper notebook, WhatsApp, Excel, Google Drive, website, none)?
A website and online donation facility are visible. No operational system for beneficiaries, cases, training, referrals, finance, partners or follow-up is described.
BIQ10 - Do you have permission/consent from people on your register to store/use their data for support services?
No published consent or privacy process was identified for beneficiary data, health information, photographs or testimonials. This is an early Review priority.
PSQ01 - What service can you name, with brief description of each that will help the beneficiaries of your project?
Published services fall under healthcare access, skills and empowerment, and community support. They include medical outreach, health awareness, HMO and provider connections, eyeglasses support, digital and employability training, and distribution of essential items.
PSQ02 - List your current services (what you do today), and for each: how often and for how many people per month?
The website reports free Excel data-analysis training for more than 35 participants, HMO partnerships, and medical and food-support outreach. Dates, locations, delivery teams, frequency and beneficiary volumes require supporting records.
PSQ03 - Which services are most needed but you cannot currently deliver?
The Foundation expresses ambitions for wider screening, treatment, insurance access, skills workshops and targeted care, but does not identify which services are currently prevented by capacity or funding.
PSQ04 - What are the top 5 needs reported by beneficiaries of your project (health, safety, work, school, counselling, etc.)?
The stated needs include affordable healthcare, food and essentials, employable skills, children's hygiene and education, and emotional support. Direct beneficiary evidence and prioritisation have not yet been provided.
PSQ05 - What is the service pathway right now? (How does a person join → receive help → follow-up?)
No complete beneficiary pathway is published. Identification or referral, eligibility, consent, delivery, safeguarding, follow-up and closure should be mapped during the Review.
PSQ06 - What makes your approach different from other organisations (if any)?
The Foundation presents an integrated combination of health, welfare support and skills. Its distinctiveness compared with other local providers has not yet been evidenced.
PSQ07 - What "minimum service package" could you reliably deliver every month if basic funding existed?
No minimum monthly service package is published. It should be defined only after resources, partner commitments and reliable delivery capacity are confirmed.
PSQ08 - What does a typical case look like from first contact to resolution?
No sufficiently detailed anonymised beneficiary journey is published. A real case should be selected to test the pathway and evidence.
PSQ09 - What are the risks/harm points in service delivery (stigma, security threats, exploitation, misinformation)?
Risks include inappropriate medical advice or referral, safeguarding failure, privacy loss, exploitation, unsafe publicity, inequitable selection, unfulfilled partner promises and weak follow-up.
PSQ10 - How do you measure whether a service worked? (simple indicators)
The website mainly reports activities and participant numbers. Indicators should distinguish people reached, services completed, referrals fulfilled, learning or health benefit, follow-up and beneficiary feedback.
PSQ11 - What services could be delivered remotely (WhatsApp/phone) vs require physical presence?
Awareness, registration, some training, referral coordination and follow-up may be remote. Medical examination, treatment, physical distribution and many safeguarding assessments require competent physical delivery.
PEQ01 - What equipment do you have? mobile phone? pc? printer? monitor? - list all you have.
This is not described in the public information reviewed. The available equipment, premises, infrastructure, ownership and control arrangements should be recorded and verified during the Review.
PEQ02 - How do we contact you? Telephone number? Office Address? Main Contact? Number of people in the management team? Number of people that the project will address?
This is not described in the public information reviewed. The available equipment, premises, infrastructure, ownership and control arrangements should be recorded and verified during the Review.
PEQ03 - Where are you working from? Would the office address be your home? a community centre? an internet cafe?
This is not described in the public information reviewed. The available equipment, premises, infrastructure, ownership and control arrangements should be recorded and verified during the Review.
PEQ04 - What equipment is working reliably, and what is broken / missing / shared / borrowed?
This is not described in the public information reviewed. The available equipment, premises, infrastructure, ownership and control arrangements should be recorded and verified during the Review.
PEQ05 - How stable is your electricity and internet (daily / weekly outages)?
This is not described in the public information reviewed. The available equipment, premises, infrastructure, ownership and control arrangements should be recorded and verified during the Review.
PEQ06 - Where is your data stored (paper files, phone, laptop)? Is there a backup?
This is not described in the public information reviewed. The available equipment, premises, infrastructure, ownership and control arrangements should be recorded and verified during the Review.
PEQ07 - Do you have a safe place to store sensitive records?
This is not described in the public information reviewed. The available equipment, premises, infrastructure, ownership and control arrangements should be recorded and verified during the Review.
PEQ08 - Do you have transport (walking, bicycle, motorbike, car, public)? Biggest travel barrier?
This is not described in the public information reviewed. The available equipment, premises, infrastructure, ownership and control arrangements should be recorded and verified during the Review.
PEQ09 - What are your printing/scanning options (none / pay-per-use shop / own printer)?
This is not described in the public information reviewed. The available equipment, premises, infrastructure, ownership and control arrangements should be recorded and verified during the Review.
PEQ10 - If you had a small "starter kit" (phone + laptop + printer), who would be responsible for it?
This is not described in the public information reviewed. The available equipment, premises, infrastructure, ownership and control arrangements should be recorded and verified during the Review.
PEQ11 - What does your workspace need to become functional (desk, chair, lockable cabinet, internet router, etc.)?
This is not described in the public information reviewed. The available equipment, premises, infrastructure, ownership and control arrangements should be recorded and verified during the Review.
PEQ12 - What would be the ideal operating base in 6 months (home office / shared centre / rented office)?
This is not described in the public information reviewed. The available equipment, premises, infrastructure, ownership and control arrangements should be recorded and verified during the Review.
PEQ13 - What security risks exist at your premises (theft, harassment, privacy exposure)?
This is not described in the public information reviewed. The available equipment, premises, infrastructure, ownership and control arrangements should be recorded and verified during the Review.
PQ01 - Who are the key roles today (leader, admin, outreach, finance, volunteer coordinator)? Names + roles.
The public information identifies founder Omodhemime Belinda Ogunrinu, but not a complete current governance and delivery structure. All named role holders and authorities require confirmation.
PQ02 - How many are active weekly (not just "on the list")?
The number active weekly is not published. Recent meeting, task, outreach, training and partner records should demonstrate actual engagement.
PQ03 - What skills do you have in the team (counselling, healthcare links, social work, advocacy, fundraising, admin, IT)?
The public information does not provide sufficient detail about the active team or its management arrangements. Named responsibilities, competence and recent evidence of engagement should be established during the Review.
PQ04 - What skills are missing that you need most urgently?
The public information does not provide sufficient detail about the active team or its management arrangements. Named responsibilities, competence and recent evidence of engagement should be established during the Review.
PQ05 - What training would help most (basic safeguarding, data handling, case management, fundraising, reporting)?
Likely training priorities are safeguarding, consent and data handling, case and referral management, financial controls, evidence collection and outcome reporting.
PQ06 - How do you recruit and manage volunteers (screening, agreements, supervision)?
The public information does not provide sufficient detail about the active team or its management arrangements. Named responsibilities, competence and recent evidence of engagement should be established during the Review.
PQ07 - Do you have a safeguarding lead / safeguarding rules? If not, who could be assigned?
No named safeguarding lead, policy or reporting route is visible in the reviewed material. This is a priority validation point.
PQ08 - What is your communication rhythm (weekly meeting, WhatsApp group, ad-hoc)?
The public information does not provide sufficient detail about the active team or its management arrangements. Named responsibilities, competence and recent evidence of engagement should be established during the Review.
PQ09 - What conflicts or workload risks exist (burnout, role confusion, disagreements)?
The public information does not provide sufficient detail about the active team or its management arrangements. Named responsibilities, competence and recent evidence of engagement should be established during the Review.
PQ10 - If funding arrived, which 3 positions would you pay first (and why)?
The public information does not provide sufficient detail about the active team or its management arrangements. Named responsibilities, competence and recent evidence of engagement should be established during the Review.
FQ01 - Do you have any current income (donations, grants, sales, membership, events)? Rough monthly average.
The website accepts donations and reports programme activity, but publishes no income sources, values or monthly pattern.
FQ02 - What are your fixed monthly costs (rent, airtime, transport, printing, internet)?
This financial information is not publicly available. The answer should be developed from the Foundation's actual accounts, transaction records, approvals and costed delivery plans during the Review.
FQ03 - What costs are unpredictable emergencies (medical cases, relocation, safety incidents)?
This financial information is not publicly available. The answer should be developed from the Foundation's actual accounts, transaction records, approvals and costed delivery plans during the Review.
FQ04 - What are the top 10 things you spend money on when you have it?
This financial information is not publicly available. The answer should be developed from the Foundation's actual accounts, transaction records, approvals and costed delivery plans during the Review.
FQ05 - Do you keep records (cashbook, receipts, mobile money statements)? Who holds them?
The presence and ownership of cashbooks, receipts, statements, approvals and reconciliations should be tested using sample transactions.
FQ06 - Do you have, or intend to open, a bank/mobile money account in the organisation name? If not, what do you use?
An online donation route is visible, but the receiving account's legal ownership and separation from company or personal funds are not publicly established.
FQ07 - What is the smallest funding amount that would make a real difference this month?
The smallest useful amount should be linked to a costed, deliverable service unit rather than an arbitrary funding request; none is yet published.
FQ08 - What is your 12-month "ideal budget" (even if rough)?
This financial information is not publicly available. The answer should be developed from the Foundation's actual accounts, transaction records, approvals and costed delivery plans during the Review.
FQ09 - What funding have you tried before (who, when, result)?
This financial information is not publicly available. The answer should be developed from the Foundation's actual accounts, transaction records, approvals and costed delivery plans during the Review.
FQ10 - What would you consider "good governance proof" to show donors money is safe (reports, receipts, photos, beneficiary confirmations)?
Good proof would include authorised budgets, account records, receipts, procurement and distribution records, partner confirmations, consented beneficiary evidence, reconciliations and outcome reports.
MQ01 - Who is your audience: donors, local community, government, clinics, schools, families, beneficiaries?
Priority audiences include beneficiaries and families, local communities, donors, volunteers, HMOs and health providers, trainers, government and community leaders. The required relationship with each should be differentiated.
MQ02 - What channels do you currently use (WhatsApp, Facebook, TikTok, radio, church announcements, community meetings)?
The website and a LinkedIn presence are visible. The use and effectiveness of other communication channels have not yet been evidenced.
MQ03 - Do you have any assets: logo, photos, short video, testimonials, case stories?
The Foundation has a name, logo, website imagery and programme claims. Ownership, authenticity, consent and supporting records for photos, testimonials and case material should be checked.
MQ04 - What is your "one sentence" message to donors?
A suitable initial donor message is: Help Harrisonite Lifecare turn compassionate healthcare, useful skills and essential support into evidenced improvement for vulnerable people.
MQ05 - What is your "one sentence" message to beneficiaries?
A suitable initial beneficiary message is: Harrisonite Lifecare aims to connect you with respectful, practical health, skills and community support while protecting your dignity and information.
MQ06 - What questions do people ask most often about your project (and what answers do you give)?
The website provides a starting public message, but this point is not sufficiently evidenced. The answer should be tested against actual audiences, communications, engagement records and consent requirements during the Review.
MQ07 - Do you have a list of contacts (supporters / organisations)? How many?
The website provides a starting public message, but this point is not sufficiently evidenced. The answer should be tested against actual audiences, communications, engagement records and consent requirements during the Review.
MQ08 - What partnerships would unlock growth fastest (hospital, police, school, local government, NGO)?
Priority partnerships are likely to include credible HMOs, hospitals or clinics, safeguarding and welfare authorities, training providers and trusted community organisations. Interest must be distinguished from active commitment.
MQ09 - What events could you run quarterly (awareness day, clinic day, school session, community meeting)?
Possible quarterly activities include a medical and eyeglasses outreach, a skills cohort, a beneficiary-listening session and a partner accountability meeting, subject to verified capacity.
MQ10 - What proof would be easiest for you to publish monthly (numbers helped, photos of deliveries, short story, receipts summary)?
Monthly public evidence could include anonymised service counts, consented stories, partner activity, training completion and a financial summary. Detailed case and transaction evidence should remain controlled.