The African Continental Free Trade Area creates the legal framework for one of the world’s largest potential integrated markets, but implementation remains uneven.
The existence of the agreement does not by itself mean that a particular product or service can move efficiently from one African country to another under preferential terms. Commercial usability depends on multiple interacting conditions, including tariff schedules, rules of origin, customs procedures, certification, national regulation, payment systems, logistics and the ability of businesses to understand and use the framework.
The immediate inspiration for this PHC Project came from Salefu Ngbede’s article Africa’s Free Trade Zone Has a Filing Cabinet Problem, which highlighted the distinction between AfCFTA’s formal existence and its practical usability, and argued for closer attention to the administrative, documentary and implementation barriers that continue to constrain trade.
The article also proposed a practical set of implementation indicators that could be tracked repeatedly rather than discussed once and forgotten. That approach strongly aligned with the PHC principle of maintaining evidence over time, identifying Concerns, recording change and converting analysis into practical follow-through.
This project is therefore independently established by PHC as a Public Interest project inspired in part by that analysis. It is not currently affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated in partnership with Salefu Ngbede, AdaIn Technologies Limited, The Liquidity Desk, the African Union or the AfCFTA Secretariat. Any future contributor, advisory, commercial or partnership relationship would be separately agreed and recorded.
PHC Project Health Control provides a structure for retaining relevant evidence, converting identified problems into Concerns and Actions, and maintaining the resulting information over time.
The project begins not with the assumption that AfCFTA is failing, but with the practical question:
What must be true for AfCFTA to be commercially usable for a particular business, product, service or trade corridor — and how do we know whether those conditions are being met?
The intention is to create a continuously maintained evidence base that helps distinguish between what is legally possible, what is administratively ready, what is commercially usable today, and what still requires intervention.