A public repository of property-ownership disputes, documenting patterns of unfair commercial tactics, governance failures, and suspected misrepresentation—so affected owners can compare notes, organise evidence, and pursue fair resolution.
Paul Brian-Boys has stepped into an active leadership role for the remaining Croyde Bay week owners and has initiated a dual-track strategy: negotiation + legal readiness. He reports that trustees are now recognising their exposure and the likelihood of being sued for breach of fiduciary duty / negligence if a fair settlement is not reached. Paul has also made progress engaging a leading no-win-no-fee solicitor willing to act for the group, strengthening credibility of the litigation pathway.
On the negotiation track, Paul is pressing the trustees toward a settlement outcome that returns 8× the trustee-table values to each remaining member (per week held) upon sale of the land, on the basis that this is the trustees’ “least-worst” option to avoid personal/legal consequences. A key operational step is now underway: requesting each remaining owner to confirm they still hold weeks and to authorise Paul as group spokesperson so the solicitor and trustees accept his standing.
The immediate blocker is formal standing: both trustees and the no-win-no-fee solicitor are pushing for evidence that Paul is authorised to represent the remaining owners as spokesperson, even if only “for the time being.” Without quick confirmations from members, progress risks stalling and momentum may be lost.
There are also typical multi-party campaign risks: uncertainty over the current member list (who still owns weeks), inconsistent participation, delays in gathering documentation (ownership evidence, historic agreements/communications, trustees’ table values), and the possibility of trustees/Saltmarsh adopting a delay-and-deflect posture until they see a “real” claim threat. Finally, the settlement benchmark references a table not included in the message, so alignment on the baseline numbers (and what “8×” practically means per member) still needs to be locked down for clarity and group unity.
The Croyde Bay Holiday Club issue has moved into a more actionable phase. A remaining minority of week owners (members who still own weeks) are seeking a good settlement linked to the sale of the land, with a proposed benchmark of at least 8× the values in the trustees’ table per owned week. The campaign lead (Paul Brian-Boys) is positioning the trustees as being at legal risk for breach of fiduciary duty / negligence if the remaining owners are not treated fairly, and is simultaneously (1) applying negotiation pressure on the trustees and (2) engaging no-win-no-fee legal representation to make the threat credible.
Immediate priority is to confirm which members still own weeks and to give Paul formal spokesperson status (not power-of-attorney) so he can progress negotiations and solicitor engagement on behalf of the remaining members. PHC Port will be used to keep a clean evidence trail of communications, membership confirmations, actions taken, and decision points.
| # | ID | Risk Summary | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 83 | Unlawful Disposal of Timeshare Property Without Co-owner Consent. | 1. Maintain communication with trustees and demand formal recognition of continued ownership rights. 2. Launch PHC Concern to identify and unite similarly affected parties. 3. Engage Legal Ombudsman and other regulators. 4. Initiate public awareness campaign if inaction continues. 5. Investigate legal grounds for restraining order or injunction on redevelopment activity. |
| 2 | 296 | Breach of Fiduciary Duty by Trustees | Document specific decisions made by trustees that favour other parties, especially Saltmarsh. |
| 3 | 297 | Constructive Fraud Through Leasehold Sale Strategy | Publicise leaseholder rights to estate agents and local planning bodies. |
| 4 | 295 | Denial of Communication Between Members | Use archived web data to show timeline of disappearance; align with testimonies. |
| 5 | 294 | Misrepresentation in Sale of Weeks | Collect testimonies from those who were approached, identify patterns, and escalate to Trading Standards or the Legal Ombudsman. |
| 6 | 91 | Trustee Lacks Mental Capacity | Document timeline of decisions made by the incapacitated trustee Press for expedited appointment of replacement |
Total Concerns 31 | 31 Open | 0 Closed
|
TECHNICAL T1 Project Scope T2 Design / Eng. T3 Technical Processes T4 Construction T5 Startup T6 Logistics / Warehouse |
COMMERCIAL C1 Feasibility/Business Case (3) C2 Market/Product C3 Finance / Funding C4 Estimate Uncertainties C5 Suppliers / Vendors C6 Legal / Contract Terms (21) C7 Currency/Inflation C8 Tax/Tariff |
|
MANAGEMENT M1 Project Management (2) M2 Project Organisation M3 Communication (5) M4 Project Resourcing M5 Operations / People M6 Operations / Permits M7 Operations / Logistics M8 Project Quality M9 Health / Safety / Environment |
REGIONAL R1 Environment / Weather R2 Security / Language R3 Regulations R4 Infrastructure R5 Utilities R6 Approvals / Permits / Licenses R7 Workforce Availability / Capability R8 Political / Government |
00 gen
Total Engagement Comments 2
| Category | Item Count | Comment Count | Last-7-Days | Comments to Process |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schedule | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Concerns | 31 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Actions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Locations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| People | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Events | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Deliverables | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |