Dear Project Sponsor / Delivery Lead,
Many early-stage Commercial projects donβt fail because the business case is weak β they fail because governance is weak. The result is predictable: avoidable admin overload, unclear priorities, weak documentation, and reporting that becomes painfully retroactive. That uncertainty increases client risk and slows good projects down.The project aims to deliver commercial outcomes and benefits through disciplined delivery, including:
We are seeking investment for a 6-month PHC Starter Pack, delivered by Order Efficiency Ltd at a full commercial PHC Consultant rates. Total required funding is approximately Β£80,000. This includes PHC Consultant delivery for the 6-month term, plus any agreed allowances (e.g. tools, training, limited founder support).
The Starter Pack prevents the project being forced into slow, phone-based administrative burden and retroactive reporting. It provides reliable remote structure and support from an office-based delivery team.By sponsoring this Starter Pack, you receive:
Stage 1 β 7-Day Review (Go / No-Go): rapid viability + governance check producing an evidence-led snapshot (critical concerns, immediate actions, baseline plan, reporting format).
Stage 2 β Setup Phase (first ~2 months): implement PHC data structures and operating rhythm.
Stage 3 β Continuation Phase (renewable 3-month periods): day-to-day PHC Service work keeping SCALPED lists current, linking evidence, and providing reporting.
Why the Review exists (two reasons): (1) to enable fail-fast β if the project is going to fail, it should fail early, visibly and cheaply, preventing wasted funding; and (2) to provide stakeholders practical by-example assurance that PHC will be beneficial in ways that are often new to teams.
Support can be provided as monthly tranches or stage funding aligned to outputs and reporting (whichever you prefer).
Purpose: confirm viability and expose the real blockers early
You receive: Go/No-Go report, prioritised concerns register, initial action plan, baseline reporting format
Purpose: install the operating system: registers, rhythm, evidence, and decision discipline
You receive: month 1β2 reporting plus a working governance structure the project can follow
Purpose: stabilise delivery discipline long enough to reliably change outcomes
You receive: consistent reporting + an evidence pack suitable for assurance, claims, and executive decisions
(Any of these options can be funded as a standalone decision, or combined as a phased pathway.)
No. The core product is an operating layer that forces visibility: registers, evidence, ownership, and routines. Advice is optional; evidence is not.
Then the Review will show it. PHC canβt replace leadership, but it makes lack of buy-in visible early so the sponsor can intervene before outcomes collapse.
Only if they arenβt auditable. PHC produces traceable evidence (time β actions β deliverables β decisions) which makes gaming harder and disputes easier to resolve.
It removes rework and meeting noise. The aim is minimum viable structure: enough to be reviewable and useful, not enough to slow delivery.
If you are open to a short call, we would welcome 15β20 minutes to confirm:
Thank you for considering an approach that makes delivery credible, accountable, and reviewable β while keeping the delivery team focused on outcomes.