Dear Sir or Madam,
Many child protection projects do not fail because the cause is weak; they fail because safeguarding systems, records, referral pathways and reporting are not strong enough to carry the seriousness of the mission. The result can be dangerous: unclear escalation, weak confidentiality, avoidable admin overload, poor evidence and late reporting to funders.The project focuses on urgent, practical needs that protect health and dignity, including:
We are seeking sponsorship for a 6-month PHC Starter Pack, delivered by Order Efficiency Ltd at a humanitarian rate (PHC consultancy delivered at 10% of standard commercial cost). Total required funding is approximately Β£9,000. Includes PHC Consultant cost, starter equipment allowance, training and limited local leadership/project support during the 6-month term. It excludes full Human Rights Kiosk deployment, specialist counselling budgets, legal case costs, major school infrastructure and full 17-LGA rollout funding.
The Starter Pack prevents the project being forced into slow, phone-based administrative burden and retroactive reporting. It provides reliable remote structure and support from an office-based delivery team.By sponsoring this Starter Pack, you receive:
Stage 1 β 7-Day Review (Go / No-Go): rapid viability + governance check producing an evidence-led snapshot (critical concerns, immediate actions, baseline plan, reporting format).
Stage 2 β Setup Phase (first ~2 months): implement PHC data structures and operating rhythm.
Stage 3 β Continuation Phase (renewable 3-month periods): day-to-day PHC Service work keeping SCALPED lists current, linking evidence, and providing reporting.
Why the Review exists (two reasons): (1) to enable fail-fast β if the project is going to fail, it should fail early, visibly and cheaply, preventing wasted funding; and (2) to provide stakeholders practical by-example assurance that PHC will be beneficial in ways that are often new to teams.
Support can be provided as monthly tranches or stage funding aligned to outputs and reporting (whichever you prefer).
Purpose: confirm safeguarding readiness and create an evidence-led start plan
You receive: a Go / No-Go report, baseline Concerns/risk register, stakeholder map, draft safeguarding workflow and pilot budget structure
Purpose: establish operating rhythm, safeguarding controls, PHC tracking, reporting and pilot-school preparation
You receive: month 1β2 reports showing activity, roles, spend evidence, school engagement and safeguarded outputs
Purpose: complete the pilot setup and produce a funder-grade evidence pack for safe scale-up
You receive: monthly reporting, live Concerns/Actions tracking, safeguarding review, final evidence/learning pack and scale recommendations
(Any of these options can be funded as a standalone decision, or combined as a phased pathway.)
Because safeguarding without governance can create new harm. The PHC setup makes disclosure, referral, confidentiality, reporting and evidence control safer from the start.
This is a 6-month starter governance package including PHC review, setup, reporting, equipment allowance, training structure and local leadership support. It is designed to make larger delivery funding safer and more credible.
That is exactly why the 7-Day Review exists. It identifies readiness gaps early, cheaply and visibly before larger commitments are made.
Because PHC provides independent structure, risk visibility, donor-ready reporting and transfer of capability to the local team. The aim is not dependency; it is safe local capacity.
No. The starter pack can review and design the kiosk concept, but full kiosk procurement, installation, maintenance, security and data systems require separate costing.
If you are open to a short call, we would welcome 15β20 minutes to confirm:
Thank you for considering an approach that makes delivery credible, accountable, and reviewable β while keeping the delivery team focused on outcomes.