Project:
269 - Water Industry Development Project
Description:
Cost contingency advice and drawdown/protection recommendations are not aligned with current exposure due to the cost-risk view not being refreshed with live risk data, estimate changes, and delivery performance. This misalignment occurs when QCRA becomes a periodic specialist activity rather than part of the operating rhythm, or when cost movements are tracked without causal linkage to risk drivers and mitigations.
Desired Outcome:
Ensure cost contingency advice and recommendations are consistently aligned with current exposure by integrating live risk data and performance metrics into routine decision-making processes.
What Could Go Wrong:
Under-protection could lead to funding shocks, while over-protection might create artificial constraints and poor decision-making.
Current Situation:
The cost-risk view is not being refreshed regularly, leading to potential misalignment between contingency advice and actual cost exposure.
Action Strategy:
Implement a routine reconciliation process between current exposure, contingency position, and leadership decisions to ensure alignment.
Concern Category:
Project Management
Keywords:
risk management, cost exposure, QCRA, contingency, decision-making, risk data, project delivery
Analysis: Not available
No snapshots found.
QCRA older than latest estimate revision / change control cycle
Contingency drawdown happening without causal linkage to risks
“Exposure” stable on paper while costs rise (classic disconnect)
Triggers
Cost exposure estimate exceeds remaining contingency by >X%
Any major change control approved without a QCRA refresh decision
Any contingency drawdown over £X requires explicit risk-driver mapping