Project:
1 - PHC Consortium
Person:
Hany El Sorogy (3)
Description:
Desired Outcome:
Either (a) maintain the valve in the current scope and design, or (b) formally document the rationale for its omission along with an agreed position on future reinstatement and potential commercial consequences.
What Could Go Wrong:
1-Late-stage request to install the valve could trigger an unbudgeted variation claim. 2-Project delay during commissioning. 3-Safety audit non-conformance. 4-Escalated contractor costs and potential dispute. 5-Reputational damage for poor decision-making and change control.
Current Situation:
No formal change order has been issued, but engineering teams are reacting to the verbal instruction. Contractor design teams are paused and may start tagging all related activity under claim preparation. This is a known high-risk change with technical and financial implications.
Action Strategy:
1-Raise the concern in internal risk review meetings. 2-Engage technical authority to assess safety implications. 3-Revisit design justification documentation. 4-If proceeding with omission, formally record decision and develop contingency plan. 5-Consider holding preemptive discussion with contractor to clarify scope expectations and reduce risk of future dispute.
Analysis: Not available
No snapshots found.